INSTITUTE OF AEROSPACE TECHNOLOGY
​
Isolated from the city, the masterplan for the Institute of Aerospace Technology is conceived as a progressive transformation of the traditional university campus plan. The organizational structure of this proposal is constructed from a typological study of the “court” scheme prevalent in late 19 th century academic planning, in conjunction with the notion of movement, order, and flight, thematic in airport design.
​
PROJECT TEAM
Chris Jarrett, Krish Suharnoko, Jay Fukuzawa, Jackie Hah, Bijoi Jain, Michael Volk, Ove Arup Engineers
​
INSTITUTE OF AEROSPACE TECHNOLOGY
​
Isolated from the city, the masterplan for the Institute of Aerospace Technology is conceived as a progressive transformation of the traditional university campus plan. The organizational structure of this proposal is constructed from a typological study of the “court” scheme prevalent in late 19 th century academic planning, in conjunction with the notion of movement, order, and flight, thematic in airport design.
​
PROJECT TEAM
Chris Jarrett, Krish Suharnoko, Jay Fukuzawa, Jackie Hah, Bijoi Jain, Michael Volk, Ove Arup Engineers
​
INSTITUTE OF AEROSPACE TECHNOLOGY
​
Isolated from the city, the masterplan for the Institute of Aerospace Technology is conceived as a progressive transformation of the traditional university campus plan. The organizational structure of this proposal is constructed from a typological study of the “court” scheme prevalent in late 19 th century academic planning, in conjunction with the notion of movement, order, and flight, thematic in airport design.
​
PROJECT TEAM
Chris Jarrett, Krish Suharnoko, Jay Fukuzawa, Jackie Hah, Bijoi Jain, Michael Volk, Ove Arup Engineers
​
INSTITUTE OF AEROSPACE TECHNOLOGY
​
Isolated from the city, the masterplan for the Institute of Aerospace Technology is conceived as a progressive transformation of the traditional university campus plan. The organizational structure of this proposal is constructed from a typological study of the “court” scheme prevalent in late 19 th century academic planning, in conjunction with the notion of movement, order, and flight, thematic in airport design.
​
PROJECT TEAM
Chris Jarrett, Krish Suharnoko, Jay Fukuzawa, Jackie Hah, Bijoi Jain, Michael Volk, Ove Arup Engineers
​
INSTITUTE OF AEROSPACE TECHNOLOGY
​
Isolated from the city, the masterplan for the Institute of Aerospace Technology is conceived as a progressive transformation of the traditional university campus plan. The organizational structure of this proposal is constructed from a typological study of the “court” scheme prevalent in late 19 th century academic planning, in conjunction with the notion of movement, order, and flight, thematic in airport design.
​
PROJECT TEAM
Chris Jarrett, Krish Suharnoko, Jay Fukuzawa, Jackie Hah, Bijoi Jain, Michael Volk, Ove Arup Engineers
​
INSTITUTE OF AEROSPACE TECHNOLOGY
​
Isolated from the city, the masterplan for the Institute of Aerospace Technology is conceived as a progressive transformation of the traditional university campus plan. The organizational structure of this proposal is constructed from a typological study of the “court” scheme prevalent in late 19 th century academic planning, in conjunction with the notion of movement, order, and flight, thematic in airport design.
​
PROJECT TEAM
Chris Jarrett, Krish Suharnoko, Jay Fukuzawa, Jackie Hah, Bijoi Jain, Michael Volk, Ove Arup Engineers
​
INSTITUTE OF AEROSPACE TECHNOLOGY
​
Isolated from the city, the masterplan for the Institute of Aerospace Technology is conceived as a progressive transformation of the traditional university campus plan. The organizational structure of this proposal is constructed from a typological study of the “court” scheme prevalent in late 19 th century academic planning, in conjunction with the notion of movement, order, and flight, thematic in airport design.
​
PROJECT TEAM
Chris Jarrett, Krish Suharnoko, Jay Fukuzawa, Jackie Hah, Bijoi Jain, Michael Volk, Ove Arup Engineers
​
INSTITUTE OF AEROSPACE TECHNOLOGY
​
Isolated from the city, the masterplan for the Institute of Aerospace Technology is conceived as a progressive transformation of the traditional university campus plan. The organizational structure of this proposal is constructed from a typological study of the “court” scheme prevalent in late 19 th century academic planning, in conjunction with the notion of movement, order, and flight, thematic in airport design.
​
PROJECT TEAM
Chris Jarrett, Krish Suharnoko, Jay Fukuzawa, Jackie Hah, Bijoi Jain, Michael Volk, Ove Arup Engineers
​
INSTITUTE OF AEROSPACE TECHNOLOGY
​
Isolated from the city, the masterplan for the Institute of Aerospace Technology is conceived as a progressive transformation of the traditional university campus plan. The organizational structure of this proposal is constructed from a typological study of the “court” scheme prevalent in late 19 th century academic planning, in conjunction with the notion of movement, order, and flight, thematic in airport design.
​
PROJECT TEAM
Chris Jarrett, Krish Suharnoko, Jay Fukuzawa, Jackie Hah, Bijoi Jain, Michael Volk, Ove Arup Engineers
​
INSTITUTE OF AEROSPACE TECHNOLOGY
​
Isolated from the city, the masterplan for the Institute of Aerospace Technology is conceived as a progressive transformation of the traditional university campus plan. The organizational structure of this proposal is constructed from a typological study of the “court” scheme prevalent in late 19 th century academic planning, in conjunction with the notion of movement, order, and flight, thematic in airport design.
​
PROJECT TEAM
Chris Jarrett, Krish Suharnoko, Jay Fukuzawa, Jackie Hah, Bijoi Jain, Michael Volk, Ove Arup Engineers
​
OUT OF SIGHT
This pilot-phase concept proposal explores the notion that small-scale design can lead to large-scale effects by using an affordable housing unit that adapts to varied urban conditions. The approach focuses on the design of a 280 s.f. unit that incrementally populates different urban site conditions, allowing familiar but also alternative building types to emerge. The basic “L-shaped” configuration of each unit is predicated on a perception of space that is “out-of-view” or “out-of-sight.”
​
PROJECT TEAM
Chris Jarrett, Peter Wong, Robert Stubs, Nazanin Modaresahmadi
​